LESS COST

Public-Private Correctional Partnerships Cost Less

Taxpayers can enjoy significant savings by utilizing public-private correctional partnerships to design, finance, build, and operate prisons, jails, community corrections facilities, and juvenile justice programs. These savings are derived from a variety of benefits offered by privatization and are documented by numerous independent research studies.
  • Operation of a federal correctional facility at Taft, California, cost between 6% and 10%, or $9.6 million and $16.5 million, less during the five-year period of the study.
  • When compared to public construction, on average, private prisons cost between 15% and 25% less in the design and construction of a new prison. Use of the design-build method with a fixed-fee contract contributes to these savings.
  • The design-build method allows for construction of new private prisons in approximately half the time of a government built prison. This saves construction debt costs, costs associated with materials price inflation, and potential litigation costs related to continuing to operate in an overcrowded existing facility.
  • Construction of a 1,318-bed facility cost taxpayers 24% less than a comparable facility built by the state.
  • Operational costs at the same 1,318-bed facility were 10.6% less than the comparable state-run facility. The rehabilitative programs provided by the private operator were significantly more sophisticated than those of the publicly managed facility.
  • Performance-based contracts often shift the burden of inmate litigation to the private provider. Doing so places a limit on government's exposure to these costs and also provides a significant economic incentive for the provider to operate the facility in a high-quality manner.
  • Medical-risk also represents a significant cost to the taxpayer. Private contracts can shift this risk to the private provider or through the application of a cap for catastrophic expenses, can at least reduce the risk for the government.
  • Utilizing the latest design technology can reduce the size of the staff necessary to operate the facility in a safe, humane, and secure manner.
  • Because private facilities operate with a profit motive, the operator has an incentive to employ the newest/most efficient electronic technology to reduce costs.
  1. Abt Associates of Cambridge, MA study, funded by the Department of Justice, 2005. Full study at www.apcto.org
  2. Study published by the Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability; 2002. Full report can be seen at www.apcto.org
  3. Ibid.








P.O. Box 29920  •  572 B Ruger Street  •  San Francisco, CA 94129-0920  |   Phone: 415-561-6174  |   |